• [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    I mean, this is potentially a good area where AI could augment human judgement.

    Leave the human in control and have the AI note to them if they made an error or forgot about a plane or something.

    Do not try and make it “self driving” or something.

    • Albbi@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      AI, possibly. Algorithms, yes. Generative AI, fuck off all the way back to reddit where the training data came from.

      High reliability organizations need deterministic tools that can be trained on so that operators can understand how they will work. They do not need an AI black box that might distract them with a hallucinated situation in the middle of a critical moment.

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        No one said this was generative AI, though. Which is good, because it’s not an LLM or genAI

        AI/ML has long been used successfully to help predict future issues based on information from previous issues. It’s one of the things it excels at over humans, because it can process a much, much larger pool of data than a human can.

        plus, AI is just a bunch of algorithms in a trench coat.

        • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          Then you have to say Machine Learning out front or everyone is going to assume you mean an LLM