There’s a dozen other RPGs I could have used as well, but Pathfinder is the meme one.

  • DeadMartyr@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Reading about it actually makes me think id like it better but I would have to play the variant that removes the linear stat increases so low-level enemies arent trivial.

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t understand how everyone doesn’t just invent or cobble together their own system. It’s so fun! And with cool players, you can build up the rules over time.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Specifically, it’s DND 3.5e with some changes.

      So, you have the best full version of DND (3.0) with all the changes made to make the system function the way it was intended and be much more balanced (3.5), with another total revision to balance, the introduction of many new mechanics, over a decade of new content, and an active publisher who makes massive use of the OGL (PF 1.0).

      • Ketram@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        God I love 2e, I know it isn’t as popular as 1e for the hardcore crowd but for actually giving new people who only know DnD something with more substance and interesting character building choice, it is absolutely awesome. I’m also not a big fan of everything stacking like crazy in 1e so there is that.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m a PF2e fan who came from PF1e (we do exist!), and one of my favorite parts is that there aren’t really any unviable build options, from either a player side or a GM side. Sure, there are combinations that are more optimal than others, but a player’s going to be able to have fun and contribute meaningfully with just about any ancestry/class combination. And since the encounter math actually works, pretty much any mathematically-correct combination of monsters a GM throws at a party will probably present the desired challenge.

          So, yes! Agreed.

    • Albbi@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      But the name is pretty dumb. You know what you’re getting with D&D. Dungeons, Dragons, probably a fantasy world. Pathfinder is… you go hiking? I have no idea.

      • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        A “Pathfinder” isn’t just hiking. It’s a person who goes first into the unknown to make the path so others may follow. It’s a name for an adventurer/traveler or another way to say “Trailblazer”.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s named after the main adventuring guild in the world, the Pathfinder Society. Which is also the name of Paizo’s irl community

    • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s a great game, though not for everyone. Balance is all over the place, it’s a contest of who’s the most OP between you and the enemy. I mean who doesn’t love a creature with 90 AC that drains your stats?

      • TachyonTele_Esq@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        who doesn’t love a creature with 90 AC that drains your stats?

        You learn to mitigate that by throwing things against the wall.